Some of the items listed are (at least partially) “learned skills”, on which performance can be improved by ‘practice’. So differing educational backgrounds may obscure the correlation.
Why shouldn’t we expect intelligence to improve with practice and wither with disuse? Intuitively, almost everything else seems to work that way.
I have no problem with intelligence changing. But if someone claims to be able to measure intelligence in any of five different ways, then each of those five metrics should change in lockstep. My point was that they might not.
Why shouldn’t we expect intelligence to improve with practice and wither with disuse? Intuitively, almost everything else seems to work that way.
I have no problem with intelligence changing. But if someone claims to be able to measure intelligence in any of five different ways, then each of those five metrics should change in lockstep. My point was that they might not.