Journalism has been infected with a style of stream of consciousness random anecdotes. Apparently many go for that. I don’t. I read a few paragraphs, start to get agitated, and recall “When you talk like this I can’t help but wonder—is there a point?” Verbal fog of this kind is a good sign of a poorly thought out idea, in my experience, or no particular idea at all. But if you blow enough smoke, you can obscure what’s happening until the end of the article. For some, that’s ideal—passing the time and “justifying” a little check next to “I read an article; I’m a smart and informed person”.
If the goal is communication, terse is good. The more concise and streamlined you can make your message, the easier it is to see the relationship between the parts and grok it.
What helps on longer arguments is to give the reader a roadmap of where you’re going, why you’re going, and how you plan to get there. That roadmap gives the reader motivation to read, and sign posts so he can know keep track of far he’s come along the trip.
Particularly on the internet, you’d better be prepared to motivate a different type of reader with a payoff, and keep him motivated by showing him along the way that you’re continuing to make progress toward that payoff for him.
Some people want to pass the time with a soothing ride through the fog, but I think this list has fewer of those types and more of the latter types. We want a payoff, and will move on when we don’t see one coming.
Journalism has been infected with a style of stream of consciousness random anecdotes. Apparently many go for that. I don’t. I read a few paragraphs, start to get agitated, and recall “When you talk like this I can’t help but wonder—is there a point?” Verbal fog of this kind is a good sign of a poorly thought out idea, in my experience, or no particular idea at all. But if you blow enough smoke, you can obscure what’s happening until the end of the article. For some, that’s ideal—passing the time and “justifying” a little check next to “I read an article; I’m a smart and informed person”.
If the goal is communication, terse is good. The more concise and streamlined you can make your message, the easier it is to see the relationship between the parts and grok it.
What helps on longer arguments is to give the reader a roadmap of where you’re going, why you’re going, and how you plan to get there. That roadmap gives the reader motivation to read, and sign posts so he can know keep track of far he’s come along the trip.
Particularly on the internet, you’d better be prepared to motivate a different type of reader with a payoff, and keep him motivated by showing him along the way that you’re continuing to make progress toward that payoff for him.
Some people want to pass the time with a soothing ride through the fog, but I think this list has fewer of those types and more of the latter types. We want a payoff, and will move on when we don’t see one coming.