an insufficient reluctance to harm those who are not so gifted as a virtue, even creating slogan to that effect such as “that which can be destroyed by the truth should be”.
This seems to be contradictory to me. The first part says that says that people like us hold it to be virtuous not to introduce the truth to those who can’t deal with it, and the second suggests that we do so. What am I missing?
This seems to be contradictory to me. The first part says that says that people like us hold it to be virtuous not to introduce the truth to those who can’t deal with it, and the second suggests that we do so. What am I missing?
No, the first part says the opposite of what you think it says.