Do you think people other than you will like it? I think many will complain about the style and i didn’t want to rewrite it more formally. also i dismissed most of the paper as irrelevant. i expect people to complain about that and don’t particularly expect the discussion to go anywhere.
You’d probably have to change the style, yes. And no, I don’t expect other people to like it, but I expect that they will respond. Also: you’re probably going to have to either go into more depth or pick a specific example, or both.
Can you explain how we believe that Bayesianism leads to better decisonmaking? I’m not even asking you to do it, I no longer have high expectations of productivity from this conversation and don’t intend to prolong it, but know that if you can’t, you don’t understand what we offer at all.
Do you think people other than you will like it? I think many will complain about the style and i didn’t want to rewrite it more formally. also i dismissed most of the paper as irrelevant. i expect people to complain about that and don’t particularly expect the discussion to go anywhere.
You’d probably have to change the style, yes. And no, I don’t expect other people to like it, but I expect that they will respond. Also: you’re probably going to have to either go into more depth or pick a specific example, or both.
What’s in it for me? I think I got the gist of what less wrong has to offer already.
Can you explain how we believe that Bayesianism leads to better decisonmaking? I’m not even asking you to do it, I no longer have high expectations of productivity from this conversation and don’t intend to prolong it, but know that if you can’t, you don’t understand what we offer at all.