I will (once again!) be raising the bar for what gets included going forward to prevent that.
I’m confused by this because the bar for what gets included seems very low. I mostly don’t read these posts because a large fraction of the “news” reported is just random tweets by people in the rationalist / adjacent sphere.
It’s like reading papers, skimming a lot of them on some topic is quite valuable in the long run, even those superficially uninteresting, and even as you only end up paying attention to 1% of their combined text. In this case, the advantage is over finding the relevant random tweets yourself.
I’m confused by this because the bar for what gets included seems very low. I mostly don’t read these posts because a large fraction of the “news” reported is just random tweets by people in the rationalist / adjacent sphere.
It’s like reading papers, skimming a lot of them on some topic is quite valuable in the long run, even those superficially uninteresting, and even as you only end up paying attention to 1% of their combined text. In this case, the advantage is over finding the relevant random tweets yourself.
Agree. I would prefer less “this guy said a thing on x.com″ and more news, statistics and technical reports.