This experiment has been done with various paintings.
it goes something like this:
experimenter offers ~30 paintings to subject
Subject rates paintings 1-10
experimenter concludes by saying; we would like to give you a painting to keep, if you want it. (painting happens to be a 3-4 on the scale of their evaluations)
experimenter leaves and comes back days or weeks later
experimenter asks subject how they like painting (1-10) or to evaluate the whole set of paintings again.
subject now rates the painting they got to keep as higher than previously.
experiment was also done on people with altzheimers and the same effect was found even when the patient had no memory of the previous experiment or the experimenter.
Sorry I don’t have a name or a link to the papers, but it was at least a few years ago. Something about cognitive dissonance I believe; about how you wouldn’t accept the painting unless you liked it therefore you convince yourself that you like it more than you did.
I also remember reading the experiment with people with Alzheimer’s. I remember it like this:
1) they showed them six paintings to order by how much they like them: #1 to #6;
2) then they told them they can take one of the paintings #3 or #4 (of course they took #3);
3) later (when the patients forgot everything), they were asked to order the six painting again… the painting #3 usually moved to a somewhat better position, and #4 to somewhat worse position.
So the lesson seems to be that when we actively accept (or reject) something, our brain adjusts to perceive that thing as better (or worse). This is not the same as rationalitazion, because it is not a bullshit you tell yourself when asked; this is a genuine change in preferences.
This experiment has been done with various paintings.
it goes something like this:
experimenter offers ~30 paintings to subject
Subject rates paintings 1-10
experimenter concludes by saying; we would like to give you a painting to keep, if you want it. (painting happens to be a 3-4 on the scale of their evaluations)
experimenter leaves and comes back days or weeks later
experimenter asks subject how they like painting (1-10) or to evaluate the whole set of paintings again.
subject now rates the painting they got to keep as higher than previously.
experiment was also done on people with altzheimers and the same effect was found even when the patient had no memory of the previous experiment or the experimenter.
Sorry I don’t have a name or a link to the papers, but it was at least a few years ago. Something about cognitive dissonance I believe; about how you wouldn’t accept the painting unless you liked it therefore you convince yourself that you like it more than you did.
I also remember reading the experiment with people with Alzheimer’s. I remember it like this:
1) they showed them six paintings to order by how much they like them: #1 to #6;
2) then they told them they can take one of the paintings #3 or #4 (of course they took #3);
3) later (when the patients forgot everything), they were asked to order the six painting again… the painting #3 usually moved to a somewhat better position, and #4 to somewhat worse position.
So the lesson seems to be that when we actively accept (or reject) something, our brain adjusts to perceive that thing as better (or worse). This is not the same as rationalitazion, because it is not a bullshit you tell yourself when asked; this is a genuine change in preferences.