I think this is actually a bad thing, and I’d argue that this sort of thing in general is one of my top hypotheses of why political discourse goes so wrong so fast, because people take their (bad) objections as having some bearing on their ideas, and thus update towards their ideas being correct:
You are inherently going to be arguing with a lot of stupid people, or a lot of “super fired up” people, when you argue ideas that affect such people. And you should have to. Most people wouldn’t be able to correctly and logically articulate why you shouldn’t steal their car, let alone anything related to Marxism or veganism, but I would say that their objections should have some bearing on whether you do so.
I think this is actually a bad thing, and I’d argue that this sort of thing in general is one of my top hypotheses of why political discourse goes so wrong so fast, because people take their (bad) objections as having some bearing on their ideas, and thus update towards their ideas being correct: