science should be sure of it’s conclusions
You are asking too much.
(Here I am defending those Sequences against you. Me who doesn’t agree with them, against you who side with them. Funny, isn’t it?)
Surer*
Science cannot be absolutely omniscient. However, it should attempt to be as consistent as possible until the point where it sacrifices consistency for truth. At least, that’s my take on it.
You are asking too much.
(Here I am defending those Sequences against you. Me who doesn’t agree with them, against you who side with them. Funny, isn’t it?)
Surer*
Science cannot be absolutely omniscient. However, it should attempt to be as consistent as possible until the point where it sacrifices consistency for truth. At least, that’s my take on it.