Given that all of the correlations reported in the paper are smaller in magnitude than −0.07, and when lumped by journal, smaller than −0.2, I don’t think that these observations, statistically “significant” though they are, can be taken as a basis for advice on choosing a title.
Given that all of the correlations reported in the paper are smaller in magnitude than −0.07, and when lumped by journal, smaller than −0.2, I don’t think that these observations, statistically “significant” though they are, can be taken as a basis for advice on choosing a title.