Ah, I’m looking forward to that. I’ve been wondering for some time now about what invariants can be expected in the design space of general minds.
Thanks, but it’s not so much about what to expect of minds in general, but rather, it’s a list of criteria you’ll need to meet if you want to design a good, intelligent, cross-domain-optimizing mind. However, the sets do overlap, and you can probably use it the way you describe, to some extent, just as long as you don’t expect everything to always hold.
That too: and the reconstructed motion relies, it seems to me, on the details which make it a convicing picture of a spinning dancer, as opposed to an abstract dark figure.
Okay, fair point then. (Still, did they have to make the, um, chest area so detailed at the … um, endpoint...?)
(Btw, I noticed after clicking on your name that you can add a location and website to your handle, which I just completed.)
Yes: I noticed because of the work I’ve done recently on the integrated Anti-Kibitzer, but otherwise I suspect it will go unnoticed. Wondering if the Tricycle folks are planning a brief top-level post to advertise the changes.
Happen to be on FICS? I just realized that there are probably a lot of chess players on Less Wrong and it wouldn’t be hard to make a Google group if there were enough frequent users.
Thanks, but it’s not so much about what to expect of minds in general, but rather, it’s a list of criteria you’ll need to meet if you want to design a good, intelligent, cross-domain-optimizing mind. However, the sets do overlap, and you can probably use it the way you describe, to some extent, just as long as you don’t expect everything to always hold.
Okay, fair point then. (Still, did they have to make the, um, chest area so detailed at the … um, endpoint...?)
(Btw, I noticed after clicking on your name that you can add a location and website to your handle, which I just completed.)
Yes: I noticed because of the work I’ve done recently on the integrated Anti-Kibitzer, but otherwise I suspect it will go unnoticed. Wondering if the Tricycle folks are planning a brief top-level post to advertise the changes.
I have also added my info—I would definitely approve of such a post.
Happen to be on FICS? I just realized that there are probably a lot of chess players on Less Wrong and it wouldn’t be hard to make a Google group if there were enough frequent users.
I mostly play postal-like chess on Gameknot as “packbat”, but I apparently have an account as “RobinZ”. I’ve never used it.
Cool, didn’t know what you looked like until now.
Nice improvement on not having profiles. It still seems oddly limiting… no room to list an email. I’d like to see a Hacker News style empty box.