I very strongly recommend trying to make something using Up Goer Five that’s a plain explanation of Infrabayesianism and what it offers that other things don’t. And not doing it in a way that makes brains scream, e.g. tons and tons of abstractions, unsaid assumptions, far reaching claims that are treated as fact, etc.
Thanks for the feedback! I don’t know that it makes sense to do that anymore now that the foundations have been changed a bunch, but I could write up a quick motivation-in-math-sense thing about infrabayes philosophically?
I very strongly recommend trying to make something using Up Goer Five that’s a plain explanation of Infrabayesianism and what it offers that other things don’t. And not doing it in a way that makes brains scream, e.g. tons and tons of abstractions, unsaid assumptions, far reaching claims that are treated as fact, etc.
Thanks for the feedback! I don’t know that it makes sense to do that anymore now that the foundations have been changed a bunch, but I could write up a quick motivation-in-math-sense thing about infrabayes philosophically?
That would really great! thank you!
Great! No promises on if, when, or how good, by default. Hopefully I can get someone like @Matthias G. Mayer to help me out with it.
Thank you so much!! I would also be happy to help!!