Yes, responded as you did. You can’t intelligently question what you’ve got near-zero familiarity with. And again, it was an invitation. No obligation.
You’re hallucinating. I didn’t ask for praise. I responded to the only statement you made that was discussable. Your upshot was that I wasn’t very nice to ownership because I said negative things about it that, according to you, don’t apply. That’s so vague it’s worthless. Your comment as a whole serves the claim that there’s nothing worth discussing here, which just raises the question in my mind why you commented at all. “Nothing to see here folks!” Well, enough that it moved you to state the obvious, supposedly. So, naw, there’s definitely something to see here. But you’d like to dismiss it as nothing, apparently.
Your upshot was that I wasn’t very nice to ownership because I said negative things about it that, according to you, don’t apply. That’s so vague it’s worthless.
Yes, responded as you did. You can’t intelligently question what you’ve got near-zero familiarity with. And again, it was an invitation. No obligation.
You gave an invitation to discuss it, and then got upset when I accepted the invitation and started to discuss it.
“Discuss” doesn’t mean “praise”.
You’re hallucinating. I didn’t ask for praise. I responded to the only statement you made that was discussable. Your upshot was that I wasn’t very nice to ownership because I said negative things about it that, according to you, don’t apply. That’s so vague it’s worthless. Your comment as a whole serves the claim that there’s nothing worth discussing here, which just raises the question in my mind why you commented at all. “Nothing to see here folks!” Well, enough that it moved you to state the obvious, supposedly. So, naw, there’s definitely something to see here. But you’d like to dismiss it as nothing, apparently.
No it isn’t, I gave a specific example.