What would your ideal public image of LW be, if you’re implying that “at best, a fringe community” is so much less preferable to it? Most of us who care about the issue probably think that LW must broaden its reach somewhat, yet not waste time and effort catering to—ahem—the less genetically fortunate, those who’d have trouble even considering the possibilities of radical change, and all the nice but unsalvageably deluded (yes, the T-word) people.
So do you fall somewhere between those, or in fact have a case for the latter? Not a loaded question; I’m purely curious.
Humble and correct denotation, consciously Hollywood-arrogant and lampshaded connotation, nothing wrong with that—or are you telling me we aren’t allowed to get some fun from that damn meta discourse? Anyway, do you have a stance?
What would your ideal public image of LW be, if you’re implying that “at best, a fringe community” is so much less preferable to it? Most of us who care about the issue probably think that LW must broaden its reach somewhat, yet not waste time and effort catering to—ahem—the less genetically fortunate, those who’d have trouble even considering the possibilities of radical change, and all the nice but unsalvageably deluded (yes, the T-word) people.
So do you fall somewhere between those, or in fact have a case for the latter? Not a loaded question; I’m purely curious.
“Less generically fortunate”?
That’s, like, not arrogant at all.
Humble and correct denotation, consciously Hollywood-arrogant and lampshaded connotation, nothing wrong with that—or are you telling me we aren’t allowed to get some fun from that damn meta discourse? Anyway, do you have a stance?