I’m somewhat confused… which reply about why I disagree makes what clear?
Also, to repeat, I don’t see that many strengths—I only gave it +3. (And on reflection, I’d give the sequel a negative vote if it had been upvoted much in the first round of the review.)
You said, “I vote on posts for presence of strengths more than for absence of weaknesses.” I agree the post has strengths, but you agree that the problems are there as well; given the failings, I disagree with the claim that this contribution is net positive.
I’m somewhat confused… which reply about why I disagree makes what clear?
Also, to repeat, I don’t see that many strengths—I only gave it +3. (And on reflection, I’d give the sequel a negative vote if it had been upvoted much in the first round of the review.)
You said, “I vote on posts for presence of strengths more than for absence of weaknesses.” I agree the post has strengths, but you agree that the problems are there as well; given the failings, I disagree with the claim that this contribution is net positive.