In the first item, “consciousness is fundamental; matter is emergent from consciousness and does independently exist” should there be a “not” after “does”?
No, that’s correct as is. It’s to differentiate it from Subjective Idealism, according to which it doesn’t independently exist. (But I see how you expect a “not” there, gonna rephrase it just slightly.)
(Also, note that I shuffled the order to make sure not to bias anyone, so “first” is random.)
Edit: I changed it to “but does independently exist” (from “and does independently exist”)
In the first item, “consciousness is fundamental; matter is emergent from consciousness and does independently exist” should there be a “not” after “does”?
No, that’s correct as is. It’s to differentiate it from Subjective Idealism, according to which it doesn’t independently exist. (But I see how you expect a “not” there, gonna rephrase it just slightly.)
(Also, note that I shuffled the order to make sure not to bias anyone, so “first” is random.)
Edit: I changed it to “but does independently exist” (from “and does independently exist”)