Colloquially, I know how to judge relative probabilities.
Philosophically (strictly), I don’t know the probability that any of my conclusions are true (because they rest on concepts I don’t pretend to know are true).
Again. my point is that it that to do justice to philosophical doubt, you need to avoid high probabilities in practical reasoning a laTaleb. But not everyone gets that. A lot of people think that using probability alone us sufficient.
Again. my point is that it that to do justice to philosophical doubt, you need to avoid high probabilities in practical reasoning a laTaleb. But not everyone gets that. A lot of people think that using probability alone us sufficient.