By doing that, you gain “maximum info” for yourself while denying it to others; in particular, if there’s a last-minute rush then anyone donating before the end of that rush may well be misled about whether the limit is likely to be reached.
It’s not necessarily wrong to favour yourself over others. But it seems a bit weird to do so in the context of a charitable donation...
That’s true, so the strategy is self-defeating if too many people follow it.. But not necessarily a bad thing, since I prefer it if others over-donate to causes I support.
By doing that, you gain “maximum info” for yourself while denying it to others; in particular, if there’s a last-minute rush then anyone donating before the end of that rush may well be misled about whether the limit is likely to be reached.
It’s not necessarily wrong to favour yourself over others. But it seems a bit weird to do so in the context of a charitable donation...
That’s true, so the strategy is self-defeating if too many people follow it.. But not necessarily a bad thing, since I prefer it if others over-donate to causes I support.