Pretty sure “polyamory is boring” was meant as a reference to this post, not in a pejorative sense. (Of course, the phrase is misleading about the content if you haven’t read that post!)
I read that post, then re-read the thread root, and re-read E’s submission…
...and I still don’t see it. I don’t notice the supposed difference in “this got normal” or thickness or focus or whatever. To me, both Scott’s post and E’s submission have about the same level of underlying energy and motivation and “Here listen to this awesome thing I really want to talk about because it gets me intellectually excited!”-ness.
Help?
(or maybe ikrase is pattern-matching something that isn’t really there, but I try to disprove the hypothesis “I’m missing something.” first)
Pretty sure “polyamory is boring” was meant as a reference to this post, not in a pejorative sense. (Of course, the phrase is misleading about the content if you haven’t read that post!)
I read that post, then re-read the thread root, and re-read E’s submission…
...and I still don’t see it. I don’t notice the supposed difference in “this got normal” or thickness or focus or whatever. To me, both Scott’s post and E’s submission have about the same level of underlying energy and motivation and “Here listen to this awesome thing I really want to talk about because it gets me intellectually excited!”-ness.
Help?
(or maybe ikrase is pattern-matching something that isn’t really there, but I try to disprove the hypothesis “I’m missing something.” first)
I had read that post, and I didn’t realize ikrase meant “boring” to be a reference to “Polyamory Is Boring” until he/she mentioned it.