There’s an implicit ”...iff the disagreeer has access to better information than she had” here, right?
If the disagreer has access to different information. Or just has different priors.
(I want to avoid the connotation “better information” = “strict superset of information”.)
Point.
If the disagreer has access to different information. Or just has different priors.
(I want to avoid the connotation “better information” = “strict superset of information”.)
Point.