Also, I feel that some of your examples of objective impact are indeed relevant to agents in general (not dying/being destroyed), while other depends on sharing a common context (cash, which would be utterly useless in Pebblia if the local economy was based on exchanging peebles for peebles).
Yeah, in the post I wrote
Even if we were on Pebblia, we’d probably think primarily of the impact on human-Pebblehoarder relations.
I don’t see the link with my objection, since you quote a part of your post when you write of value impact (which is dependent on the values of the specific agents) and I talk about the need for context even for objective impact (which you present as independent of values and objectives of specific agents)
Oh, I think I see. Yes, this is explicitly talked about later in the sequence—“resources” like cash are given their importance by how they affect future possibilities, and that’s highly context-dependent.
(Let me know if this still isn’t addressing your objection)
Yeah, in the post I wrote
I don’t see the link with my objection, since you quote a part of your post when you write of value impact (which is dependent on the values of the specific agents) and I talk about the need for context even for objective impact (which you present as independent of values and objectives of specific agents)
Oh, I think I see. Yes, this is explicitly talked about later in the sequence—“resources” like cash are given their importance by how they affect future possibilities, and that’s highly context-dependent.
(Let me know if this still isn’t addressing your objection)
Thanks, I’ll keep going then.