Caledonian, I think the clear subtext is “A benevolent god as defined by those who believe in it”. It’s important to realise that a benevolent, omnipotent god doesn’t make sense as far as we can tell. Sure you can propose the existence of something that cannot even in principle be understood—but what would be the point of that? Interesting when down the pub I suppose. Such things may or may not exist, but they are of no practical importance.
Caledonian, I think the clear subtext is “A benevolent god as defined by those who believe in it”. It’s important to realise that a benevolent, omnipotent god doesn’t make sense as far as we can tell. Sure you can propose the existence of something that cannot even in principle be understood—but what would be the point of that? Interesting when down the pub I suppose. Such things may or may not exist, but they are of no practical importance.