Great ideas! I incorporated a not so subtle mention of the x-risks career network into #6 based on your suggestion. My goal here was to keep things general in tone and only deeply permeate the subtext + links with my own value judgments. It’s a kind of overt neutrality with a strong undercurrent of things you can look into if you’re interested. But if you never click on a link, you could just as easily be a member of any current activist set and still get a lot of value out of my writing.
Actually I think I’ll write up a new section like “Become more generally capable” which seems like something I didn’t specifically cover but almost certainly should.
Anyone have suggestions for “must have” items to go in that summary section? What other Less Wrong posts are good for that?
EDIT: Added as the new point #5 now—it’s general if you just read it but rich in specific examples if you follow up on the resources linked from it
“Become more generally capable” is an applause sign; it’s too generic, not actionable. Although you can mitigate this by including as many specific actions as possible. Maybe stress the importance of proper diet (Paleo) and movement and sufficient sleep on general capability. Not sure what else would count without it turning into a list of how to become more specifically capable, contra “generally”.
“Become more generally capable” is an applause sign
A rather weak one if it is. I don’t associate it with strong affect of any kind.
; it’s too generic
Possibly. More specificity could be helpful.
, not actionable.
Sure it is. Search your brain, the internet or lesswrong for personal development techniques and practices. There are posts here on self improvement, including some specifically for developing capabilities for ‘world saving’. (One way to be less general would be to link to one of them.)
Perhaps I’m using the term “applause sign” incorrectly. My intended meaning there is that it is obvious, it provides no new information to anyone, everyone will not their heads as though it is wisdom, but it is not specific enough to make it easy for people to do. Much like “lose weight” is a bad goal, but “get to 190 lbs, 10% body fat by April 15th” is a better goal, and is even better as “get to 190 lbs, 10% body fat by April 15th by limiting intake to 1000-1500 calories, 90% Paleo/primal foods, heavy lifting 3 days a week, daily yoga and mobility work, and 5 nature hikes a week for at least 30 minutes.”
Pardon if the “applause sign” term was misappropriated. “Sounds like wisdom, but is not informative enough to be helpful” is probably closer.
Great ideas! I incorporated a not so subtle mention of the x-risks career network into #6 based on your suggestion. My goal here was to keep things general in tone and only deeply permeate the subtext + links with my own value judgments. It’s a kind of overt neutrality with a strong undercurrent of things you can look into if you’re interested. But if you never click on a link, you could just as easily be a member of any current activist set and still get a lot of value out of my writing.
Actually I think I’ll write up a new section like “Become more generally capable” which seems like something I didn’t specifically cover but almost certainly should.
Anyone have suggestions for “must have” items to go in that summary section? What other Less Wrong posts are good for that?
EDIT: Added as the new point #5 now—it’s general if you just read it but rich in specific examples if you follow up on the resources linked from it
“Become more generally capable” is an applause sign; it’s too generic, not actionable. Although you can mitigate this by including as many specific actions as possible. Maybe stress the importance of proper diet (Paleo) and movement and sufficient sleep on general capability. Not sure what else would count without it turning into a list of how to become more specifically capable, contra “generally”.
A rather weak one if it is. I don’t associate it with strong affect of any kind.
Possibly. More specificity could be helpful.
Sure it is. Search your brain, the internet or lesswrong for personal development techniques and practices. There are posts here on self improvement, including some specifically for developing capabilities for ‘world saving’. (One way to be less general would be to link to one of them.)
Perhaps I’m using the term “applause sign” incorrectly. My intended meaning there is that it is obvious, it provides no new information to anyone, everyone will not their heads as though it is wisdom, but it is not specific enough to make it easy for people to do. Much like “lose weight” is a bad goal, but “get to 190 lbs, 10% body fat by April 15th” is a better goal, and is even better as “get to 190 lbs, 10% body fat by April 15th by limiting intake to 1000-1500 calories, 90% Paleo/primal foods, heavy lifting 3 days a week, daily yoga and mobility work, and 5 nature hikes a week for at least 30 minutes.”
Pardon if the “applause sign” term was misappropriated. “Sounds like wisdom, but is not informative enough to be helpful” is probably closer.
“Not even an applause light” reflects well on your point. ;)