The article you link to doesn’t mention either “pattern” or “deception” in its text—at least, not in any relevant sense. It looks more like a laundry list of purported concerns; I’m ready to believe that some of these concerns might be more justified than others—but that still does not convince me that there’s a relevant ‘pattern’ here.
Did you follow the link to the roundup of Gleb’s and InIn’s pattern of deception?
The article you link to doesn’t mention either “pattern” or “deception” in its text—at least, not in any relevant sense. It looks more like a laundry list of purported concerns; I’m ready to believe that some of these concerns might be more justified than others—but that still does not convince me that there’s a relevant ‘pattern’ here.