“What kind of competitive or political system would make fragmented squabbling AIs safer than an attempt to get the monolithic approach right?” by saying “the answer is, ‘None.’ It’s like asking how you should move your legs to walk faster than a jet plane” — again, implying extreme skepticism that political elites will manage AI properly.
It seems like a bit of a non sequitur to go from competing AIs being unsafe to elites not managing AI properly. Was there meant to be an additional clause explaining that elites would tend to favor multiple competing AIs over a single monolithic one? (Perhaps this was an artifact of the deletion of the quote referenced in the footnote?)
It seems like a bit of a non sequitur to go from competing AIs being unsafe to elites not managing AI properly. Was there meant to be an additional clause explaining that elites would tend to favor multiple competing AIs over a single monolithic one? (Perhaps this was an artifact of the deletion of the quote referenced in the footnote?)