A reasonable person might say that a group being ridiculed deserved that ridicule for a number of reasons, or that the ridiculer is off base. So, two “no answers”, two different reasons.
Most people or groups don’t “know themselves” so outside information about yourself or the entity that you belong to is almost always valuable.
The Law has some answers for when human relations fail. It might ask: “Would a Reasonable Person find the e-mail offensive?”
So tell me about Charlie Hebdo.
What specifically would you like to know?
You said
What are the answers for the cartoons which Charlie Hebdo published?
A reasonable person might say that a group being ridiculed deserved that ridicule for a number of reasons, or that the ridiculer is off base. So, two “no answers”, two different reasons.
Most people or groups don’t “know themselves” so outside information about yourself or the entity that you belong to is almost always valuable.