Zvi, I disagree. I think there is no positive value to you taking a position on Trump admin rhetoric being good or bad. There are a zillion people commenting on that.
Your comparative advantage is focusing on specifics; what does the AI action plan instruct federal agencies to do? How can the most important priorities be implemented most effectively? Who is thinking clearly about this and has a plan for e.g. making sure the US has an excellent federal response plan when warning shots happen? Signal boosting smart effective policies/policy thinkers is how you can best use your platform. Don’t contaminate your message with partisanship.
Wading into “Trump is good/bad” discourse isn’t going to change who wins the election. People you know already spent ridculous amounts of money on this, and were crushed. Time to ignore politics and focus on policy: specifically, complicated tech policy that most people don’t understand, that you have the ability to shape.
Zvi, I disagree. I think there is no positive value to you taking a position on Trump admin rhetoric being good or bad. There are a zillion people commenting on that.
Your comparative advantage is focusing on specifics; what does the AI action plan instruct federal agencies to do? How can the most important priorities be implemented most effectively? Who is thinking clearly about this and has a plan for e.g. making sure the US has an excellent federal response plan when warning shots happen? Signal boosting smart effective policies/policy thinkers is how you can best use your platform. Don’t contaminate your message with partisanship.
Wading into “Trump is good/bad” discourse isn’t going to change who wins the election. People you know already spent ridculous amounts of money on this, and were crushed. Time to ignore politics and focus on policy: specifically, complicated tech policy that most people don’t understand, that you have the ability to shape.