You can dismiss this objection by replacing the coin with a novel experimental test with an easily computed expected probability of success– say, the very first test of spin-up vs. spin-down for silver atoms.
Frequentists can’t claim relevant data sets for every experiment that has an obvious prior, without engaging in their own form of reference class tennis.
You can dismiss this objection by replacing the coin with a novel experimental test with an easily computed expected probability of success– say, the very first test of spin-up vs. spin-down for silver atoms.
Frequentists can’t claim relevant data sets for every experiment that has an obvious prior, without engaging in their own form of reference class tennis.
How can they have an obvious prior without an obvious relevant data set?