I took “meaning” in the sense that Lara Foster and Valter are discussing to be an example of the mind projection fallacy. As Lara says, “meaningful to x” is coherent, but just “meaningful” is like “taller” without “taller than x.”
See also St. Anselm’s ontological argument, which assumes that “to be conceived of” is a property of the thing being conceived.
I took “meaning” in the sense that Lara Foster and Valter are discussing to be an example of the mind projection fallacy. As Lara says, “meaningful to x” is coherent, but just “meaningful” is like “taller” without “taller than x.”
See also St. Anselm’s ontological argument, which assumes that “to be conceived of” is a property of the thing being conceived.