Some additional context around the interim report shared with OpenAI on August 1st
To reiterate, as mentioned in “Note on independence” and its footnote, none of the redactions had any effect on our conclusions or tone, and we think it’s reasonable for this review to occur for an output like this (public and not intended as a robust formal oversight artifact).
Thank you for your clear and prompt response! Given the previous issues with OpenAI and NDAs whose existence itself can’t be disclosed without penalty I thought it was important to ask.
It does not! We redacted the following:
Additional details and specific language about the “assurance checklist”
Some longer reasoning trace extracts
Some additional context around the interim report shared with OpenAI on August 1st
To reiterate, as mentioned in “Note on independence” and its footnote, none of the redactions had any effect on our conclusions or tone, and we think it’s reasonable for this review to occur for an output like this (public and not intended as a robust formal oversight artifact).
Thank you for your clear and prompt response! Given the previous issues with OpenAI and NDAs whose existence itself can’t be disclosed without penalty I thought it was important to ask.