I’m actually getting concerned here. It looks like PhilGoetz’s constant group selection advocacy is actually working. The very title is a question that assumes group selection in favor of a phenonemon that doesn’t even exist in order for the question to even make sense. And he has not only been taken seriously but received upvotes while ridicule of the assumptions gets downvotes.
Well, sure, but couldn’t you assume something more ridiculous if you tried hard enough?
I’m actually getting concerned here. It looks like PhilGoetz’s constant group selection advocacy is actually working. The very title is a question that assumes group selection in favor of a phenonemon that doesn’t even exist in order for the question to even make sense. And he has not only been taken seriously but received upvotes while ridicule of the assumptions gets downvotes.