The question under discussion was: Is Anthropic “quite in sync with the AI x-risk community”? If it’s taking unilateral actions that are unpopular with the AI x-risk community, then it’s not in sync.
there were multiple questions under discussion. his reply could validly be said to apply to the subset of your post, implying or directly saying, that anthropic is doing a bad thing, ie he is highlighting that Disagreement is real and allowed
you are correct that there is a separate vein here about the factual question of whether they are “in sync” with the ai x-risk community. that is a separate question that 1a3orn was not touching with their reply. you are mixing the two frames. if this was intentional then you were being disingenuous. if it was unintentional, you were being myopic
I have the courage of my convictions; you ignore the opinions of others; he takes reckless unilateral action.
The question under discussion was: Is Anthropic “quite in sync with the AI x-risk community”? If it’s taking unilateral actions that are unpopular with the AI x-risk community, then it’s not in sync.
there were multiple questions under discussion.
his reply could validly be said to apply to the subset of your post, implying or directly saying, that anthropic is doing a bad thing, ie he is highlighting that Disagreement is real and allowed
you are correct that there is a separate vein here about the factual question of whether they are “in sync” with the ai x-risk community. that is a separate question that 1a3orn was not touching with their reply. you are mixing the two frames. if this was intentional then you were being disingenuous. if it was unintentional, you were being myopic