Yes, I agree with this. I’d count it as “so negligible as to be beneath bothering to waste a neuron on it” :)
The evidence here isn’t actually negligible, I don’t think. It’s just that the posterior probability is negligible.
Yes, I agree with this. I’d count it as “so negligible as to be beneath bothering to waste a neuron on it” :)
The evidence here isn’t actually negligible, I don’t think. It’s just that the posterior probability is negligible.