History interpretation is not clear cut. There is a lot of things that can be explained with hallucinogenics, like mushrooms being a staple in the communion of early days christianity.
Rare earth theory keeps adding more and more constraints. There is a lot that we don’t know about the cosmos and quite frequently previous assumptions about astrophysics are invalidated by new observations
UFOs are one of the favorite psyops to hide the existence of global mind control tech and advanced VR tech
The hidden bias: we went from anthropocentric to heliocentric, but maybe the truth is in the middle. Meaning that there might be quantum properties exploited by biology that only happen in our corner of the universe.
There is a class of flying objects that exploits tech just for the purpose of “awing”, very useful in global cognitive war.
The problem with LessWrong and conspiracies is that LW relies on rationatily and epistemology. But when you have an adversary well equipped to drown the 1% truth in distracting narratives, corrupting evidence, planting fake testimonies, there isn’t much of a rational conversation to be had. Weaponization of plausible deniability, the failure of Occam’s razor are real issues with no solution that I know of.
There are some problems with UFOs:
History interpretation is not clear cut. There is a lot of things that can be explained with hallucinogenics, like mushrooms being a staple in the communion of early days christianity.
Rare earth theory keeps adding more and more constraints. There is a lot that we don’t know about the cosmos and quite frequently previous assumptions about astrophysics are invalidated by new observations
UFOs are one of the favorite psyops to hide the existence of global mind control tech and advanced VR tech
The hidden bias: we went from anthropocentric to heliocentric, but maybe the truth is in the middle. Meaning that there might be quantum properties exploited by biology that only happen in our corner of the universe.
There is a class of flying objects that exploits tech just for the purpose of “awing”, very useful in global cognitive war.
The problem with LessWrong and conspiracies is that LW relies on rationatily and epistemology. But when you have an adversary well equipped to drown the 1% truth in distracting narratives, corrupting evidence, planting fake testimonies, there isn’t much of a rational conversation to be had. Weaponization of plausible deniability, the failure of Occam’s razor are real issues with no solution that I know of.