He makes some good points in the first article; your cited section, however, comes across as commercially motivated reasoning without substantive evidence.
Sorry! I suck at excerpts. I have added the title “Executive Summary” back into it, which I had originally cut for brevity. Does that clarify, or should I perhaps quote a different section?
He makes some good points in the first article; your cited section, however, comes across as commercially motivated reasoning without substantive evidence.
Sorry! I suck at excerpts. I have added the title “Executive Summary” back into it, which I had originally cut for brevity. Does that clarify, or should I perhaps quote a different section?