You ask several questions of the form “why is X true?” without first addressing the more basic question “is X true?” I dispute your framing of the situation and agree with the other commenters (commentators?), especially TimS.
Even if you want to vigorously defend the point of view that David has a right to sexual satisfaction, it does not follow that David has a right to sexual satisfaction with Jane.
Even if you want to vigorously defend the point of view that David has a right to sexual satisfaction, it does not follow that David has a right to sexual satisfaction with Jane.
Provided they are mono (which given everything else in the post seems extremely likely), so long as they don’t break up David doesn’t have a right to sexual satisfaction with either Jane (because of her religion) or anyone else (because they’re in a mono relationship).
You ask several questions of the form “why is X true?” without first addressing the more basic question “is X true?” I dispute your framing of the situation and agree with the other commenters (commentators?), especially TimS.
Even if you want to vigorously defend the point of view that David has a right to sexual satisfaction, it does not follow that David has a right to sexual satisfaction with Jane.
Provided they are mono (which given everything else in the post seems extremely likely), so long as they don’t break up David doesn’t have a right to sexual satisfaction with either Jane (because of her religion) or anyone else (because they’re in a mono relationship).
He has the right to leave the relationship with Jane.