I mean, even if you’re mostly pursuing a particular set of final values (which is not what you’re advocating here), there are probably strong reasons to make coordination a high priority (which is close to what you’re advocating here).
Well, I did say “to the extent permitted by 1”—there’s probably conflict here—but I wasn’t suggesting CEV as something that makes coordination easy. I’m saying it’s a good principle for judging final outcomes between two different paths that have similar levels of coordination. Ofc we’d have to estimate the “happiness in hindsight”, but this looks tractable to me.
I mean, even if you’re mostly pursuing a particular set of final values (which is not what you’re advocating here), there are probably strong reasons to make coordination a high priority (which is close to what you’re advocating here).
Well, I did say “to the extent permitted by 1”—there’s probably conflict here—but I wasn’t suggesting CEV as something that makes coordination easy. I’m saying it’s a good principle for judging final outcomes between two different paths that have similar levels of coordination. Ofc we’d have to estimate the “happiness in hindsight”, but this looks tractable to me.