Did nobody make the claim that ‘guy who claims he wants free speech will restrict speech instead’?
I interpreted the following as saying just that:
Free speech good but endangered by this man who wants free speech.
No, because that point is for the case where he does want free speech, just that there are other factors that might interfere with that. This point covers the case where he doesn’t actually want free speech (i.e. wants it for me but not thee).
I interpreted the following as saying just that:
No, because that point is for the case where he does want free speech, just that there are other factors that might interfere with that. This point covers the case where he doesn’t actually want free speech (i.e. wants it for me but not thee).