No, I do not claim any such thing. To clarify, that statement and the related paragraph assume that there might be grounds for claiming irrational behaviour is to be decried. The reason for this is that a given utility function, with some exceptions, cannot be maximised if its maximiser shuns knowledge as an obscurantist would; this is not generalisable to “sexual preferences” as such, but applies to behaviours conflicting with self-improvement, rationality, preservation of utility functions, prevention of counterfeit utilities, self-protectiveness, efficient acquisition and use of resource, et cetera. The exceptions are utility functions that directly conflict with the aforementioned drives; I’m personally unsure whether to consider them legitimate, but do concede that others might be more opinionated.
No, I do not claim any such thing. To clarify, that statement and the related paragraph assume that there might be grounds for claiming irrational behaviour is to be decried. The reason for this is that a given utility function, with some exceptions, cannot be maximised if its maximiser shuns knowledge as an obscurantist would; this is not generalisable to “sexual preferences” as such, but applies to behaviours conflicting with self-improvement, rationality, preservation of utility functions, prevention of counterfeit utilities, self-protectiveness, efficient acquisition and use of resource, et cetera. The exceptions are utility functions that directly conflict with the aforementioned drives; I’m personally unsure whether to consider them legitimate, but do concede that others might be more opinionated.