That essay strikes me as asserting that people can improve their thinking, but having very little detail about how, or about the process of getting over the psychological hump for those who are committed to the impossibility of improving their thinking rather than just ignorant of it.
This idea is discussed pretty early on in the Sequences; I always found that post to be one of the most compelling.
That essay strikes me as asserting that people can improve their thinking, but having very little detail about how, or about the process of getting over the psychological hump for those who are committed to the impossibility of improving their thinking rather than just ignorant of it.
Agreed—but I was following David’s advice and keeping it simple.
And I read that one just yesterday, but didn’t spot it today as being in there …