It would be slower for sure, at least, being bound to human dynamics. But “same problems but slower” isn’t the same as a solution/alternative. Admittedly better in the limited sense that it’s less likely to end with straight up extinction, but it’s a rather grim world either way.
Since it’s slower, the tech development cycle is faster in comparison. Tech development --> less expensive tech --> more access --> less concetration of power --> more moral outcomes.
It would be slower for sure, at least, being bound to human dynamics. But “same problems but slower” isn’t the same as a solution/alternative. Admittedly better in the limited sense that it’s less likely to end with straight up extinction, but it’s a rather grim world either way.
Since it’s slower, the tech development cycle is faster in comparison. Tech development --> less expensive tech --> more access --> less concetration of power --> more moral outcomes.