Eliezer’s form of moral realism about good (as a real but particular shared concept of value which is not universally compelling to minds) seems to imply that most of us prefer to be at least a little bit evil, and can’t necessarily be persuaded otherwise through reason.
Seems right.
And Nietzsche would probably argue the two impulses towards good and evil aren’t really opposites anyway.
Eliezer’s form of moral realism about good (as a real but particular shared concept of value which is not universally compelling to minds) seems to imply that most of us prefer to be at least a little bit evil, and can’t necessarily be persuaded otherwise through reason.
Seems right.
And Nietzsche would probably argue the two impulses towards good and evil aren’t really opposites anyway.