Having asserted that your claim is, in fact, new information
I wouldn’t assert that. I thought I was stating the obvious.
Yes, I think I misspoke earlier, sorry. It was only “new information” in the sense that it wasn’t in that particular sentence of Eliezer’s—to anyone familiar with discussions of GAI, your assertion certainly should be obvious.
Yes, I think I misspoke earlier, sorry. It was only “new information” in the sense that it wasn’t in that particular sentence of Eliezer’s—to anyone familiar with discussions of GAI, your assertion certainly should be obvious.
Ahh. That’s where the “new information” thing came in to it. I didn’t think I’d said anything about new so I’d wondered.