I think “Connectome-specific harmonic waves and meditation” has the right idea. There’s not much to say since it’s just a list of links to other sources. The most interesting thing about that post is Vaniver’s comment. I think my article makes a good point that Veniver missed. Namely, that increasing resonance within a brain increases information flow between different parts. This gives a computational advantage above pure aesthetic symmetry. The goal isn’t simplicity. It’s coordination.
Vaniver makes a good point in his final paragraph. This isn’t addressed in “Connectome-specific harmonic waves and meditation” but is addressed in my post.
[A] ‘maximize harmony’ story needs to have really strong boundary conditions to create the same sorts of conflicts.
This is accounted for by CSHW because (1) oscillations within state networks are observably contained in their state networks and (2) high frequency oscillations propagate a shorter distance than low frequency oscillations.
I think “Connectome-specific harmonic waves and meditation” has the right idea. There’s not much to say since it’s just a list of links to other sources. The most interesting thing about that post is Vaniver’s comment. I think my article makes a good point that Veniver missed. Namely, that increasing resonance within a brain increases information flow between different parts. This gives a computational advantage above pure aesthetic symmetry. The goal isn’t simplicity. It’s coordination.
Vaniver makes a good point in his final paragraph. This isn’t addressed in “Connectome-specific harmonic waves and meditation” but is addressed in my post.
This is accounted for by CSHW because (1) oscillations within state networks are observably contained in their state networks and (2) high frequency oscillations propagate a shorter distance than low frequency oscillations.