There clearly IS a moral difference between influencing people and manipulating them.
I think the difference ultimately comes down to the question, “Is this in THEIR best interest?” It’s obviously in YOUR interest (or you think it is), or you wouldn’t do it. But when it’s not in THEIR best interest, you are literally acting like a psychopath.
There are trickier cases where it has huge benefits for you at a minor cost to others, or where it’s fair competition (which is normally zero-sum but morally not that problematic)… but in general, I think what really turns me off about the Pick-Up Artist community is precisely their failure to recognize the difference between influencing and manipulating. So don’t make the same mistake, or you’ll never get my support.
Their best interest as judged by whom? If you mean their best interest as judged by them, does changing someone’s opinion of what their best interest is count as influencing or manipulating them?
If I infer that pnrjulius means that it’s influence if I cause someone to behave in their own best interest, and manipulation if I cause them to behave in ways not in their best interest, and we assume (as you say) it’s best interest as judged by them, then presumably if someone intervenes so as to change my judgment of my best interests, that’s influence if the judgment-change is in my best interests as I judged them at the time of the intervention, and manipulation otherwise.
I’m not really sure why any of this matters, though.
If you want a job, and don’t know for sure if you’re the best candidate, do you think it would be psychopathic to present yourself in the way that you think makes it most likely that you’ll be hired?
There clearly IS a moral difference between influencing people and manipulating them.
I think the difference ultimately comes down to the question, “Is this in THEIR best interest?” It’s obviously in YOUR interest (or you think it is), or you wouldn’t do it. But when it’s not in THEIR best interest, you are literally acting like a psychopath.
There are trickier cases where it has huge benefits for you at a minor cost to others, or where it’s fair competition (which is normally zero-sum but morally not that problematic)… but in general, I think what really turns me off about the Pick-Up Artist community is precisely their failure to recognize the difference between influencing and manipulating. So don’t make the same mistake, or you’ll never get my support.
Their best interest as judged by whom? If you mean their best interest as judged by them, does changing someone’s opinion of what their best interest is count as influencing or manipulating them?
If I infer that pnrjulius means that it’s influence if I cause someone to behave in their own best interest, and manipulation if I cause them to behave in ways not in their best interest, and we assume (as you say) it’s best interest as judged by them, then presumably if someone intervenes so as to change my judgment of my best interests, that’s influence if the judgment-change is in my best interests as I judged them at the time of the intervention, and manipulation otherwise.
I’m not really sure why any of this matters, though.
If you want a job, and don’t know for sure if you’re the best candidate, do you think it would be psychopathic to present yourself in the way that you think makes it most likely that you’ll be hired?