Your argument is plausible. On the other hand, this review is for 2019, not 2017 (when this post was written) nor 2013 (when this series of ideas was originally laid out). So it seems like it should reflect our current-ish thinking.
I note that the page for the review doesn’t have anything about voting criteria. This seems like something of an oversight?
Your argument is plausible. On the other hand, this review is for 2019, not 2017 (when this post was written) nor 2013 (when this series of ideas was originally laid out). So it seems like it should reflect our current-ish thinking.
I note that the page for the review doesn’t have anything about voting criteria. This seems like something of an oversight?