Re your specific example, I still think that list is pretty misleading about what I actually think, so I do still want to set the record straight.
It does seem more valuable to litigate the economics disagreements on the object level, but we need clarity on the views themselves to do that productively. I think the econ supplement to ai 2040 is the best place we’ve done this so far: https://ai-2040.com/supplements/economics-of-plan-a
Thanks for this pushback. I think you are right about the top level that generally it was too angry, and decided to edit it to tone it down (but preserved the original and the diff here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i6Y9KTK2cyJ7y3XQtGY6f9F4nloRQr-rep8qSsicYUA/edit?tab=t.0 for transparency). I’m sorry about that.
Re your specific example, I still think that list is pretty misleading about what I actually think, so I do still want to set the record straight.
It does seem more valuable to litigate the economics disagreements on the object level, but we need clarity on the views themselves to do that productively. I think the econ supplement to ai 2040 is the best place we’ve done this so far: https://ai-2040.com/supplements/economics-of-plan-a