Well, in this case the universal wavefunction does factorise into a product of two functions ๐(light cone)๐(cat), where ๐(cat) has an โaliveโ branch and โdeadโ branch, but ๐(light cone) does not. Iโd rather identify with ๐(light cone) than ๐(light cone ร cat) [i.e. ๐(universe)], but whatever.
The point you were trying to make is correct anyway, either way.
Both?
No.
Well, in this case the universal wavefunction does factorise into a product of two functions ๐(light cone)๐(cat), where ๐(cat) has an โaliveโ branch and โdeadโ branch, but ๐(light cone) does not. Iโd rather identify with ๐(light cone) than ๐(light cone ร cat) [i.e. ๐(universe)], but whatever.
The point you were trying to make is correct anyway, either way.