Not to pick on you specifically, but just as a general comment, I’m getting a bit worried about the rationalist decontextualized content policing. It seems it usually goes like this: someone cultivates an epistemological practice (say how to extract conceptual insights from diverse practices) → they decide to cross-post their thoughts on a community blog interested in epistemology → somebody else unfamiliar with the former’s body of work comes across it → interprets it into a pattern they might rightfully have identified as critique-worthy → dump the criticism there. So maybe it’d be better if comments were written by people who can click through the author’s profile to interpret the post in the right context.
[Epistemic status of this comment: Performative, but not without substance.]
Not to pick on you specifically, but just as a general comment, I’m getting a bit worried about the rationalist decontextualized content policing. It seems it usually goes like this: someone cultivates an epistemological practice (say how to extract conceptual insights from diverse practices) → they decide to cross-post their thoughts on a community blog interested in epistemology → somebody else unfamiliar with the former’s body of work comes across it → interprets it into a pattern they might rightfully have identified as critique-worthy → dump the criticism there. So maybe it’d be better if comments were written by people who can click through the author’s profile to interpret the post in the right context.
[Epistemic status of this comment: Performative, but not without substance.]