Well, no—it’s a set of explanations. A very large set, consisting of every explanation other than ‘the sun is powered by nuclear fusion’, but smaller than T | ~T, and therefore somewhat useful, however slightly.
This was talking about set sizes, which is what I replied about.
You can’t quantify your fallibility in the sense of knowing how likely you are to be mistaken in an unexpected way. That’s not possible.
This was talking about set sizes, which is what I replied about.
You can’t quantify your fallibility in the sense of knowing how likely you are to be mistaken in an unexpected way. That’s not possible.