While the study you link to is pretty interesting, it doesn’t claim anything about IQ, g, or intelligence.
Is it possible that the correlation between g and success isn’t about raw intelligence, it’s about being able to access one’s intelligence in situations (like classrooms) which involve thresholds for easily improving one’s status?
I’m not sure of what this means—what does it mean that “the correlation between g and success is about raw intelligence” ? Since g is pretty much an attempt to formalize what we mean by raw intelligence, that reads to me like “the correlation between raw intelligence and success is not about raw intelligence”.
While the study you link to is pretty interesting, it doesn’t claim anything about IQ, g, or intelligence.
I’m not sure of what this means—what does it mean that “the correlation between g and success is about raw intelligence” ? Since g is pretty much an attempt to formalize what we mean by raw intelligence, that reads to me like “the correlation between raw intelligence and success is not about raw intelligence”.